Intra-Group loan transactions are amongst those transactions that are most frequently discussed from a Transfer Pricing perspective. As an Austrian specificity, however, auditors regularly do not only focus on the arm's length character of the interest rate but place a particularly strong focus on whether the debt instrument might be re-qualified into “hidden equity” (leading to a loss of interest deductibility). Therefore, it should be clearly documented that unrelated parties would have granted debt financing under comparable circumstances.
The following indicate that no re-qualification into hidden equity should be made:
These criteria should be assessed from an overall perspective at the time the loan is granted. For example, if a subsidiary is in a loss-making position for years and no turnaround is expected, the debt character of a loan might be challenged. A partial re-qualification is also possible.
Concerning the interest rate, Austrian Transfer Pricing Guidelines are fully in line with the OECD Guidelines. The traditional comparable unrelated price method is generally seen as the preferred method. Factors such as repayment sum, maturity date, repayment dates, currency and securities need to be considered.
While practitioners regularly refer to the recent case law of the German Federal Court of Justice (May 18, 2021, I R 4/14; May 18, 2021, I R 62/14; June 09, 2021, I R 32/17),
these have not been implemented in the Austrian Transfer Pricing Guidelines. Hence, there is still some uncertainty as to the extent to which bank loans are considered comparable to intra-group financing.
In view of the current inflation, it should also be considered if loan agreements are still up to date. In the case of long-term agreements with fixed interest rates, early repayments or re-negotiations might need to be applied.
Sie haben Fragen zu unseren Services oder der WTS? Lassen Sie es uns wissen. Füllen Sie dazu unser kurzes Kontaktformular aus. Wir werden uns so schnell wie möglich bei Ihnen melden.